The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases
The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases
Blog Article
Taking someone’s life is often a heinous crime that devastates family members, communities, and society as a whole. The severe punishment serves as a deterrent to possible offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon through the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined via the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been of your view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be issue to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion may be regarded as, however, we've been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, matter to availability of vacancy issue on the approval of the competent authority.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty to the accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases listened to within the state court, within the same level.
Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really issue to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion could be regarded, however, we are apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy issue to the approval from the competent authority.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
3. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of law and guaranteeing that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively proven now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be website paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system is not without flaws: overhauling is overdue along with the regulation regarding murder requires major reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the least that can be achieved is to make sure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.